Why Wall Street Likes What It Sees

by | November 9, 2020

After nearly four days of laborious vote counting, the US has a new president-elect. In what follows, we explore the opportunities for change, the challenges in store and the broad implications for the fundamentals that determine asset prices.

New presidential administrations often claim mandates. Frequently, they are accorded political ‘honeymoons’ to initiate policy changes. In more recent and acrimonious US political history, however, mandates have proven ephemeral and honeymoons feel more like broken marriages.

In the coming weeks, both parties will take stock of the outcome as they formulate their political strategies with, as ever, an eye toward the next elections. How the vote is interpreted by the incoming Biden Administration, leadership in Congress and at the state and local level will significantly shape the policies to emerge. And these policies will deeply impact economic growth, public health, regulatory and environmental policies, which in turn will determine how investors respond.

The obvious conclusion from this election is that  voters have tired of Donald Trump, his shenanigans and lies, and—above all—his incompetent handling of the Covid-19 pandemic. Voters sent a message that they prefer competence to false bravado, particularly when lives are at stake. The resounding message to Washington, but also to every state capital house, is to engage science and professional management to combat the pandemic. Indeed, in his first speech as president elect, Joe Biden’s only specific policy pronouncement regarded the establishment of a blue-ribbon panel of scientific, medical and public health advisors on pandemic control.

A science-based approach to tackling Covid-19, alone, may explain much of the positive market response to the election outcome. After all, sustainable recovery, the re-establishment of fuller employment and the fortunes of many businesses hinge on pandemic suppression.

As clear as the personal repudiation of Donald Trump was, however, in most other respects the election results delivered mixed messages. Trump himself received over 70 million votes, by far the largest vote total of a losing president. The much anticipated ‘blue wave’ never materialized. Two-run off elections in Georgia will determine whether the Republicans maintain a smaller majority in the US Senate, or whether the final tally might be 50 seats for each party, with Vice President-elect Harris casting the occasional tie-breaking vote.

Meanwhile, Republicans made gains in the House of Representatives, celebrated a net gain of one governorship and held their own in state legislatures nationwide. American voters may have fired Donald Trump, but they did not dismiss the Republican Party.

Accordingly, both President-elect Biden and Republicans on Capitol Hill will contend, with some justification, that the others’ policies do not enjoy the broad support of the electorate. Biden won largely because he pinned blame for the pandemic and its economic consequences on Donald Trump. It is less clear that he won because voters believe his platform offers better solutions to weak growth, skewed income distribution, failing schools or crumbling infrastructure. By a wide margin, voters want those challenges addressed, but have not rendered verdicts as to how.

Equally, the election provides little insight into other major policy challenges. This week the Supreme Court may strike down the Affordable Care Act (i.e., ‘Obamacare’). Polls overwhelming indicate that Americans want access to healthcare and coverage of pre-existing conditions. But the fact that even the Democratic Party, via its primaries, repudiated the single payer option (‘Medicare for All’) touted by its left wing, offers little guidance for what new approach would garner support. For now, at least, the election outcome has been greeted with sighs of relief from private health insurers, hospitals and doctors, who are likely to lobby hard to retain the contours of America’s egregiously expensive and dubious provision of healthcare.

Similarly, the election results produced little visibility on addressing climate change. President-elect Biden may want to re-join the Paris Accord, but any binding treaty changes will face tough challenges in the US Senate. The same is true for carbon taxes. Executive orders are always possible but carry less force in law and are easily reversed in the future.

If the preceding analysis reads less hopefully than the joyous celebrations that broke out across US cities this past Saturday evening, it is worth noting that in two areas a Biden Administration can make a decisive contribution for the betterment of Americans and the world.

Ironically, the first step is not following in the footsteps of the Clinton or Obama Administrations. Like those predecessor Democratic White Houses, the Biden Administration will inherit a weakened economy and huge budget deficits courtesy of reckless Republican leadership. But unlike Clinton or Obama, for three reasons President-elect Biden will not act as the fiscal ‘janitor in chief’, cleaning up the Republican mess by raising taxes and cutting expenditures during his first term.

First, his economic team understands that an economy suffering high unemployment and at risk from the pandemic requires fiscal stimulus, not austerity. While hopes for sustained large fiscal stimulus have receded against the prospect of divided government in Washington, austerity is not in the cards.

Second, Fed Chairman Powell has clearly and forcefully signaled both the Fed’s determination to an inflation overshoot and the central bank’s approval of fiscal stimulus. The Fed is willing to subordinate monetary policy to deficit financing for the first time since the Second World War, offering a Biden Administration fiscal latitude without fear of ‘bond market vigilantes’.

Third, Democrats have realized that cleaning up the fiscal mess Republicans have habitually left behind pays few, if any, political dividends. Politics argues against austerity at least as much as economics, at least until after 2022.

Delayed fiscal adjustment, supported by the Federal Reserve, is unambiguously positive for risk assets, including equities. Combined with signs next year that pandemic control is more effective, markets will welcome US fiscal sensibility.

Lastly, President-elect Biden can and likely will lower perceptions of risk across a broad array of foreign policy initiatives. Trade discussions will elbow out acrimonious trade wars. Unhelpful tariffs are likely to be negotiated away. Contrary to misconception, over the past 75 years Democratic administrations have initiated or signed many more multilateral trade agreements than Republicans.

A Biden presidency should also be expected to treat adversaries in a less risky fashion. Russia and China are more likely to be reminded softly that America wields large economic, diplomatic and military sticks, a message reinforced by an incoming administration willing to recommit to its allies and alliances.

For investors, what’s the bottom line?

Mostly, it is positive. Markets will respond favorably to a science-based approach to pandemic control. They will also welcome concerted monetary easing, accompanied by modest fiscal stimulus—and the absence of fiscal austerity. Risk premiums will decline as it becomes apparent that America is willing to re-engage allies and adversaries alike in more conventional and certain ways.

At the same time, markets—perhaps more cynically—will also applaud the lower chances that corporate income taxes will be hiked, that carbon taxes will be imposed, that healthcare will be revolutionized or that big tech will be broken up. Those may be socially less-desirable outcomes, but they, too, will find support on Wall Street.

The 2020 elections may have delivered mixed political messages, but for investors the news is mostly positive.

About the Authors

Larry Hatheway

Larry Hatheway has over 25 years experience as an economist and multi-asset investment professional. He is co-founder, with Alexander Friedman, of Jackson Hole Economics, LLC, which offers commentary and analysis on the global economy, policy & politics, and their broad implications for capital markets. Prior to co-founding Jackson Hole Economics, LLC Larry worked at GAM Investments from 2015-2019 as Group Chief Economist and Global Head of Investment Solutions, where he was responsible for a team of 50 investment professionals managing over $10bn in assets. While at GAM, Larry authored numerous articles on the world economy, policy-making and multi-asset investment strategy. Larry was also the lead investment manager for various mandates, funds and an actively managed multi-asset index. Larry also served on the GAM Group Management Board, was Chairman of the GAM London Limited Board and served as member of the GAM Investment Management Limited Board. Larry was also Chairman of the GAM Diversity & Inclusion Committee. During his tenure at GAM, Larry was based in London, UK and Zurich, Switzerland. From 1992 until 2015 Larry worked at UBS Investment Bank as UBS Chief Economist (2005-2015), Head of Global Asset Allocation (2001-2012), Global Head of Fixed Income and Currency Strategy (1998-2001), Chief Economist, Asia (1995-1998) and Senior International Economist (1992-1995). During his tenure at UBS, Larry was also a standing member of the UBS Wealth Management Investment Committee. While at UBS, Larry worked in Zurich, Switzerland, London, UK (various occasions), Singapore and Stamford, CT. At both GAM Investments and UBS Investment Bank Larry was widely recognised for his appearances on Bloomberg TV, CNBC, the BBC, CNN and other media outlets. He frequently published articles and opinion pieces for Bloomberg, CNBC, Project Syndicate, and The Financial Times, among others. Before joining UBS in 1992, Larry held roles at the Federal Reserve (Board of Governors), Citibank and Manufacturers Hanover Trust. Larry Hatheway holds a PhD in Economics from the University of Texas, an MA in International Studies from the Johns Hopkins University, and a BA in History and German from Whitman College. Larry is married with four grown children and a loving Cairn Terrier, and resides in Wilson, WY.

Alex Friedman

Alex Friedman is the co-founder of Jackson Hole Economics, LLC, a private research organization which provides commentary and analysis on economics, politics, the environment and finance, and develops actionable ideas for how sustainable growth can be achieved. Friedman is a senior business leader with two decades of experience growing and transforming businesses in the financial and non-profit industry. He was the CEO of GAM Investments in London and chairman of the firm’s executive board. Previously, he was the Global Chief Investment Officer of UBS Wealth Management in Zurich, chairman of the UBS global investment committee, and a member of the executive board of the private bank. Before moving to UBS, Alex Friedman served as the Chief Financial Officer of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. He was a member of the foundation’s management committee, oversaw strategic planning, and managed a range of the day-to-day operating functions of the world’s largest philanthropic organization. Friedman also created the foundation’s program-related investments group, the largest impact investing philanthropic fund in the world. He started his career in corporate finance at Lazard. Friedman served as a White House Fellow in the Clinton administration and as an assistant to the Secretary of Defense. He is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and the Chairman of the Advisory Board of Project Syndicate, the non-profit opinion page that provides world-class commentary to over 500 newspapers globally. In addition, he is a board member of the American Alpine Club and the Jackson Hole Community Housing Trust, and has served on the boards of the Gates-Cambridge Trust, the Seattle Art Museum, and a number of other non-profits. Friedman is a regular contributor to several newspapers and thought leadership groups and has published numerous opinion editorials on topics including economics, finance, philanthropy, and politics in Project Syndicate, Bloomberg, The Wall Street Journal, The Financial Times, The Guardian, CNBC, The South China Morning Post, The Chronicle of Philanthropy, and other news outlets. He is also the author of Babu’s Bindi, and The Big Thing, both children’s book. An avid mountaineer and rock climber for 30 years, Friedman has climbed some of the world’s highest mountains and led the first major climb to raise money for charity through an ascent of Mt. McKinley. He holds a JD from Columbia Law School, where he was a Harlan Fiske Stone Scholar, an MBA from Columbia Business School, and a BA from Princeton University.

Related Posts

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This