Forget Inflation, Think Recession

by | June 6, 2022

For all the deluge of ink spilled on inflation over the past year, it was always just the warm-up act. The main event is recession, and it is now taking center stage. 

Over a year ago, we warned that investors and policymakers were complacent to inflation risk. But we also noted that inflation was unlikely to be durable. To be sure, we misjudged inflation’s duration, but as recent data indicate, underlying price and wage measures of inflation have crested and are beginning to subside. 

That should be good news. So, why do investors remain averse to risk? Mainly because they, too, sense that cyclical risks are shifting from fears of inflation to fundamental concerns about downside growth risks, including potential economic and earnings recessions. 

So, let’s unpack each of these issues.

To begin, fears of inflation have peaked for several reasons. First, US medium-to-long-term inflation expectations (whether measured by surveys or via inflation-linked securities) have remained ‘well behaved’, meaning that neither households nor financial market participants expect inflation to be a lasting phenomenon. Second, as seen in last week’s employment report, US nominal wage growth is moderating, removing the risk (which was never large to begin with) of a ‘wage-price spiral’. Slowing nominal wage growth is, of course, a double-edged sword, insofar as falling real incomes pose clear risks to final demand. Third, core measures of inflation that remove outliers (‘trimmed mean’ estimates) are showing signs that underlying price pressures are moderating.

Moreover, and as we have argued in the past and as contributing author Andy Cates points out in his latest contribution to Jackson Hole Economics, US and global inflation have precious little to do with easy monetary policies. Rather, expenditure switching (from goods to services), inflexible production during the pandemic, supply chain disruptions, and soaring food and energy prices courtesy of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine have coincided to boost prices at their fastest rate in a generation. Labor supply rigidities—as reflected in a moribund US labor force participation rate—have also boosted nominal wage gains, albeit insufficient to keep up with prices.

Simply put, the inflation we are experiencing today is not a ‘monetary phenomenon’. It is mostly the result of adverse supply shocks, coupled with a large fiscal impulse during the pandemic. Yet those two catalysts—supply-side shocks and government spending—are probably non-recurring events. Without further production shortfalls or fiscal impulses, inflation will therefore subside without the need for much monetary policy tightening.

Unfortunately, central bankers don’t share that view. Most Federal Open Market Committee members (Atlanta Fed President Bostic excepted) continue to press the case for consecutive 50 basis point hikes at the upcoming rate-setting meetings. More ominously, they call for a period of ‘above neutral’ policy rates to curb inflation. That is worrisome, particularly as receding underlying inflation pressures indicate that a period of sub-trend growth (never mind a recession) will be unnecessary to restore ‘price stability’. 

Central bankers fret almost as much about their credibility as they do about their inflation mandate. Having taken one ‘on the chin’ last year by underestimating the degree and breadth of inflation, they are apparently now loath to relent their hawkishness, even though that is what the data are beginning to suggest would be appropriate. The classic cognitive bias of sunk costs—a trap where we are likely to continue an endeavor if we are already invested in it, even if it means going against evidence that shows it is no longer the best decision—is to blame. 

Ostensibly, the Fed is trying to pull off the proverbial ‘soft landing,’ but history suggests this is unlikely. In only three cases since 1955 has the Fed been able to tighten and avoid a subsequent recession. To make matters more challenging, in this cycle a restrictive Fed stance will coincide with a tightening of fiscal policy, economic weakness abroad, and war on Europe’s doorstep, fueling serious commodity dislocation. The stars are not well aligned for those who feel a 2023 recession can be avoided.

The coming week offers data that will shed light on the health of the US consumer and the housing market. US consumer credit has recently soared, perhaps a healthy sign of a solid job market, or perhaps a sign that falling real wages mean that consumers have had to borrow to keep apace. Rising mortgage rates are also apt to cool an overheated housing market—perhaps no bad thing. Yet consumption and housing are likely to be at the forefront of any slowdown in final demand as real incomes and household financing costs are squeezed by high headline inflation and elevated long-term interest rates. 

So, what should investors and other recession watchers keep their eyes on? 

As the economic outlook shifts from fears of inflation to fears about growth, yield curves ought to flatten or even invert. The dollar should give up some of its year-to-date strength, particularly against the Japanese yen, reflecting a peak in relative monetary policy divergence. And soaring commodity prices, above all for cyclical sectors such as energy and industrial metals, should begin to flatten out.

But peak inflation, which is now arriving, does not by itself heralds a bottom to the global equity market sell-off. Only a ‘soft landing’ can do so, and the odds are against it. Equity market risk is shifting from interest rates (and the discount rate) to earnings, which suggests global stock markets may still struggle in the weeks to come.

About the Authors

Larry Hatheway

Larry Hatheway has over 25 years experience as an economist and multi-asset investment professional. He is co-founder, with Alexander Friedman, of Jackson Hole Economics, LLC, which offers commentary and analysis on the global economy, policy & politics, and their broad implications for capital markets. Prior to co-founding Jackson Hole Economics, LLC Larry worked at GAM Investments from 2015-2019 as Group Chief Economist and Global Head of Investment Solutions, where he was responsible for a team of 50 investment professionals managing over $10bn in assets. While at GAM, Larry authored numerous articles on the world economy, policy-making and multi-asset investment strategy. Larry was also the lead investment manager for various mandates, funds and an actively managed multi-asset index. Larry also served on the GAM Group Management Board, was Chairman of the GAM London Limited Board and served as member of the GAM Investment Management Limited Board. Larry was also Chairman of the GAM Diversity & Inclusion Committee. During his tenure at GAM, Larry was based in London, UK and Zurich, Switzerland. From 1992 until 2015 Larry worked at UBS Investment Bank as UBS Chief Economist (2005-2015), Head of Global Asset Allocation (2001-2012), Global Head of Fixed Income and Currency Strategy (1998-2001), Chief Economist, Asia (1995-1998) and Senior International Economist (1992-1995). During his tenure at UBS, Larry was also a standing member of the UBS Wealth Management Investment Committee. While at UBS, Larry worked in Zurich, Switzerland, London, UK (various occasions), Singapore and Stamford, CT. At both GAM Investments and UBS Investment Bank Larry was widely recognized for his appearances on Bloomberg TV, CNBC, the BBC, CNN and other media outlets. He frequently published articles and opinion pieces for Bloomberg, CNBC, Project Syndicate, and The Financial Times, among others. Before joining UBS in 1992, Larry held roles at the Federal Reserve (Board of Governors), Citibank and Manufacturers Hanover Trust. Larry Hatheway holds a PhD in Economics from the University of Texas, an MA in International Studies from the Johns Hopkins University, and a BA in History and German from Whitman College. Larry is married with four grown children and a loving Cairn Terrier, and resides in Wilson, WY.

Alex Friedman

Alex Friedman is the co-founder of Jackson Hole Economics, LLC, a private research organization which provides analysis on economics, politics, the environment and finance, and develops actionable ideas for how sustainable growth can be achieved. Friedman is a senior leader with two decades of experience growing and transforming organizations in the financial and non-profit industry. He was the CEO of GAM Investments in London and chairman of the firm’s executive board. Previously, he was the Global Chief Investment Officer of UBS Wealth Management in Zurich, chairman of the UBS global investment committee, and a member of the executive board of the private bank. Before moving to UBS, Alex Friedman served as the Chief Financial Officer of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. He was a member of the foundation’s management committee, oversaw strategic planning, and managed a range of the day-to-day operating functions of the world’s largest philanthropic organization. Friedman also created the foundation’s program-related investments group, the largest impact investing philanthropic fund in the world. He started his career in corporate finance at Lazard. Friedman served as a White House Fellow in the Clinton administration and as an assistant to the U.S. Secretary of Defense. He is a member of the board of directors of Franklin Resources, Inc. (Franklin Templeton), a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, Chairman of the Advisory Board of Project Syndicate and a board member of the American Alpine Club. Friedman is a regular contributor to a range of newspapers and thought leadership groups and is also the author of Babu’s Bindi, and The Big Thing, both children’s books. He is an avid mountaineer and rock climber and led the first major climb to raise money for charity through an ascent of Mt. McKinley. Friedman holds a JD from Columbia Law School, where he was a Harlan Fiske Stone Scholar, an MBA from Columbia Business School, and a BA from Princeton University.

Related Posts

FTX and When Foxes Guard Hen Houses

FTX and When Foxes Guard Hen Houses

A great deal has been written about the demise of FTX, the cryptocurrency exchange run by Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF). Many of the post-mortems have focused on potential fraud, drawing comparisons to Enron’s collapse in the early 2000s. Less ink has been spent on...

Continue Reading

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This