Market Drivers for 2022

by | January 3, 2022

As the new year commences, it is opportune to consider what may be the key drivers of market performance in 2022. And those which may not matter much. 

In what follows, we provide a short list of candidates, which we will continue to explore in upcoming pieces for Jackson Hole Economics. We divide our list into two parts— three under-appreciated factors that are likely to have outsized impacts on markets this year and beyond, and three overestimated factors that will probably matter less than the consensus now thinks.

We welcome feedback from our readers, whom we also wish a happy and healthy 2022.

Factors that will matter

Slowing corporate earnings. Global equity markets have roughly doubled from their 2020 lows. While many casual observers readily assign that outcome to easy money and excessive exuberance, stellar earnings growth has been a major driver of market performance. But earnings momentum is now slowing, both on account of less favorable comparisons (so-called ‘base effects’) and as higher costs impinge on profit margins. With valuations above long-term averages across most markets and sectors, earnings deceleration combined with less favorable monetary policy stances will prove more challenging for equity returns. The days of rising markets accompanied by low volatility are coming to an end. Market performance this year is likely to be bumpy. A proper equity market correction is also likely in 2022.

Chinese growth. Isolated abroad and handicapped by debt overhangs, above all in its domestic property sector, China is likely to surprise most observers by growing faster this year than the consensus expects. Consensus forecasts peg 2022 Chinese GDP growth at just below 5%. We suggest that by year end China’s GDP growth will comfortably top that figure. 

Two reasons underpin our view. First, re-tooling the global economy away from long and vulnerable supply chains will prove to be more difficult than many assume. Indeed, that is a major factor explaining the persistent bottlenecks that plague today’s world economy. Accordingly, short-term supply responses are more likely to take advantage of existing modes of production and distribution than those that one day may—or may not—replace them. China remains the world’s industrial superpower, accounting for over a quarter of global goods production. Reports of its death are premature. 

Second, beset by Covid disruption, trade distortions, and property market hangovers, China is apt to ease monetary and fiscal policy, and invest greater sums in infrastructure, a well-worn form of economic stimulus. Highlights may include big announcements to improve water storage, transportation, and efficiency, as well as in alternative energy. President Xi recognizes that, as powerful as his sword may be, domestic order and tranquility are best assured by rising living standards.

French elections. On April 10 and 24 (should a run-off be necessary) of 2022, the French people will go to the polls to elect their president. Legislative elections will probably follow. The French elections matter, following those in Germany last year. Europe is adjusting to major changes—Brexit, the realization that the US is no longer the reliable ally it once was, and Russian aggression in the East. Merkel is gone and Mario Draghi now represents Europe’s best known and most capable leader. If the center holds in France, as we expect it will, the stage will be set for Europe to move, albeit slowly, to address its key security challenges—Russia and climate change. Nothing happens quickly in Europe without a crisis, but the recognition that Germany, France, and Italy will enjoy centrist majorities and that their voters have rejected radical extremes will serve the old continent, its capital markets, and its currency well. 

Factors that won’t matter (as much as the consensus believes)

Inflation. A year ago, we wrote that inflation was likely to be more important for economies, monetary policies, and financial markets than most observers then believed. Today, we are willing to argue that inflation fears are now overrated. That might seem odd, given that major central banks—the Federal Reserve, the European Central Bank, and the Bank of England—have recently capitulated, jettisoning notions of ‘transitory price pressures’ and vowing to end quantitative easing and even hike rates. 

Yet we believe that a combination of elements, including receding ‘base effects’, more flexible supply responses, peaking developed country growth, and—perhaps most important—stable inflation expectations, will combine to slow price pressures during 2022, re-assigning inflation to yesterday’s story. Accordingly, central banks will gradually recalibrate their monetary policies over the next twelve months in a fashion that will be well communicated and therefore predictable. Given that markets already discount an end to quantitative easing and several Fed rate hikes by end-2022, the odds of jarring monetary policy surprises in 2022 are not as high as many would have us believe.

Fiscal policy. Following consecutive years (2020 and 2021) of massive—indeed, unprecedented—fiscal easing in advanced economies, it seems obvious that the absence of the same would weigh heavily on global growth in 2022. Compounding matters are legitimate concerns that Democrats will not be able to muster a majority for a significant ‘Build Back Better’ legislative agenda in the US Congress.

Yet economics is not arithmetic. GDP is more than simple addition. Lags and still impactful fiscal multipliers lessen the size of ‘cliff-like’ fiscal surprises in the next 12 months. US and global household savings rates are now declining, implying that private sector demand already is and will continue to replace the impetus of fiscal stimulus. Finally, few countries are prepared this year to make large discretionary cuts in government outlays, much less raise taxes. 

Assuming the pandemic does not resurface in new and dangerous ways—and omicron suggests that, if anything, infections are becoming less risky—job and wage growth, coupled by peaking price inflation, will provide a lift to real purchasing power, enabling rising consumption to offset some fiscal drag in 2022. And politics, for better or worse, will ensure that aggressive fiscal tightening is postponed to a later date.

Bond yields. Nominal government bond yields in developed countries remain well below economically sustainable levels. Negative real interest rates are not normal. They ought to gravitate toward trend rates of growth, between 1% and 2.5% depending on the economy in question. But 2022 is unlikely to be the year that bond yields snap back toward sanity. 

It is difficult to argue, for example, that the end of quantitative purchases by central banks will jar bond investors. If that were the case, the clear commitments by major central banks to end such policies would have already produced a rush for the exits. High inflation is also unlikely to be the catalyst for a bond market capitulation. Inflation is already elevated, having risen late last year without making a dent in bond pricing. It is now poised to recede in 2022. Lastly, budget deficits, new bond issuance and the rollover of existing debt burdens are ‘known-knowns’, implying they are also unlikely to rattle debt markets.

Yes, bond yields ought to move higher in 2022, but the pace is likely to be gradual. Moderate global growth, receding inflation, the end of fiscal expansion, and tepid monetary policy tightening is apt to produce somewhat higher yields, but also a flatter yield curve. Indeed, curve flattening is more likely to drive market performance in 2022 than higher yields, particularly for styles and sectors that are sensitive to the shape of the yield curve.

About the Authors

Larry Hatheway

Larry Hatheway has over 25 years experience as an economist and multi-asset investment professional. He is co-founder, with Alexander Friedman, of Jackson Hole Economics, LLC, which offers commentary and analysis on the global economy, policy & politics, and their broad implications for capital markets. Prior to co-founding Jackson Hole Economics, LLC Larry worked at GAM Investments from 2015-2019 as Group Chief Economist and Global Head of Investment Solutions, where he was responsible for a team of 50 investment professionals managing over $10bn in assets. While at GAM, Larry authored numerous articles on the world economy, policy-making and multi-asset investment strategy. Larry was also the lead investment manager for various mandates, funds and an actively managed multi-asset index. Larry also served on the GAM Group Management Board, was Chairman of the GAM London Limited Board and served as member of the GAM Investment Management Limited Board. Larry was also Chairman of the GAM Diversity & Inclusion Committee. During his tenure at GAM, Larry was based in London, UK and Zurich, Switzerland. From 1992 until 2015 Larry worked at UBS Investment Bank as UBS Chief Economist (2005-2015), Head of Global Asset Allocation (2001-2012), Global Head of Fixed Income and Currency Strategy (1998-2001), Chief Economist, Asia (1995-1998) and Senior International Economist (1992-1995). During his tenure at UBS, Larry was also a standing member of the UBS Wealth Management Investment Committee. While at UBS, Larry worked in Zurich, Switzerland, London, UK (various occasions), Singapore and Stamford, CT. At both GAM Investments and UBS Investment Bank Larry was widely recognized for his appearances on Bloomberg TV, CNBC, the BBC, CNN and other media outlets. He frequently published articles and opinion pieces for Bloomberg, CNBC, Project Syndicate, and The Financial Times, among others. Before joining UBS in 1992, Larry held roles at the Federal Reserve (Board of Governors), Citibank and Manufacturers Hanover Trust. Larry Hatheway holds a PhD in Economics from the University of Texas, an MA in International Studies from the Johns Hopkins University, and a BA in History and German from Whitman College. Larry is married with four grown children and a loving Cairn Terrier, and resides in Wilson, WY.

Alex Friedman

Alex Friedman is the co-founder of Jackson Hole Economics, LLC, a private research organization which provides analysis on economics, politics, the environment and finance, and develops actionable ideas for how sustainable growth can be achieved. Friedman is a senior leader with two decades of experience growing and transforming organizations in the financial and non-profit industry. He was the CEO of GAM Investments in London and chairman of the firm’s executive board. Previously, he was the Global Chief Investment Officer of UBS Wealth Management in Zurich, chairman of the UBS global investment committee, and a member of the executive board of the private bank. Before moving to UBS, Alex Friedman served as the Chief Financial Officer of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. He was a member of the foundation’s management committee, oversaw strategic planning, and managed a range of the day-to-day operating functions of the world’s largest philanthropic organization. Friedman also created the foundation’s program-related investments group, the largest impact investing philanthropic fund in the world. He started his career in corporate finance at Lazard. Friedman served as a White House Fellow in the Clinton administration and as an assistant to the U.S. Secretary of Defense. He is a member of the board of directors of Franklin Resources, Inc. (Franklin Templeton), a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, Chairman of the Advisory Board of Project Syndicate and a board member of the American Alpine Club. Friedman is a regular contributor to a range of newspapers and thought leadership groups and is also the author of Babu’s Bindi, and The Big Thing, both children’s books. He is an avid mountaineer and rock climber and led the first major climb to raise money for charity through an ascent of Mt. McKinley. Friedman holds a JD from Columbia Law School, where he was a Harlan Fiske Stone Scholar, an MBA from Columbia Business School, and a BA from Princeton University.

Related Posts

FTX and When Foxes Guard Hen Houses

FTX and When Foxes Guard Hen Houses

A great deal has been written about the demise of FTX, the cryptocurrency exchange run by Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF). Many of the post-mortems have focused on potential fraud, drawing comparisons to Enron’s collapse in the early 2000s. Less ink has been spent on...

Continue Reading

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This